What happened?
Whilst Hershal recovers from his bite and amputated leg, Rick negotiates a truce with the inmates to help them clear out a cell block of walkers for half of their food and the promise they will never trespass Rick's part of the prison. The operation sees Rick have to take action against some of the more threatening members of the inmate group, ultimately leaving just a couple of them remaining to fend for themselves.
Whilst Carol attempts to get practice on operating on walkers for the moment she may be called on to assist Lori's pregnancy she is observed from someone, or someones, unknown. Hershal does eventually awaken, thankful to be alive. Whilst Rick is quick to praise Lori for her help the emotional fracture that exists between them seems wider than ever with little chance of repair.
Thoughts
Oh if Shane could see Rick now. You may imagine him gazing down from heaven at the irony of it. Only, of course, The Walking Dead has very much posited itself as a world where heaven definitely does not exist. Yet Shane's devilish behaviour in the past season, so castigated and maligned by so many, has now become the kind of action Rick will take without debate and the rest of the group will accept as necessity. Anyone threatens the group - walker or man - they are killed.
That Rick slaughtered the prisoner in the white vest who was clearly becoming a liability to his own people as well as Rick came as little surprise. I did think, however, that he would be considered the one rotten apple in the group and that maybe Rick, once he had removed him, would consider the others as potential new people to join them. But then my thinking is not as merciless as Rick's. Perhaps all he sees are more mouths to feed, more potential dissenting voices, more possible people that may challenge for his crown. So they either step aside or they have to go.
If ever proof were needed about how far Rick has gone, the moment he chased the escaping convict only to shut him out to be fed to the walkers was it. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying Rick was too cruel. What I am remarking upon is the change he has been through. Shane once tried to escape with Otis to return medical supplies to the critically ill Carl; the tough decision he made on the spot was to shoot Otis so the walkers would eat him and let Shane escape so he could save the boy.
Rick shut a man out he thought presented a threat to his people in cold blood. Is there a difference? Maybe, but not much. Only the matter of Shane's dwindling sanity towards the end is the distinction. Rick, for now at least, retains a hold of his senses even though it is evidently taking a toll on his emotional wellbeing.
Last episode I discussed how Hershal's injuries ought to surely see him turn into a walker, if the disease is a virus transmitted through the blood. This episode dwelled on Hershal's injuries and, I think, tried to establish some form of general rule about how the infection spreads through a bite. There was the very pointed difference made with the big man who was injured down his neck and shoulder, areas of his body that could not be removed, which made it clear he was unable to be saved from becoming one of the undead. So, what have we learned?
Well, it was clarified for any latecomers that the infection to become a walker exists in everyone. How that was spread is unknown, and also irrelevant. It's a fact. If a person dies they will become a walker, unless their brain is destroyed. That's that. It's usually the case in zombie-lore that if a person is bitten by a zombie anywhere they will, eventually, become a zombie. I believe The Walking Dead sticks to that principal; if a person is bitten they will, if left untreated, become a walker.
Hershal, however, was not left untreated. He was bitten in the lower leg and, minutes later, that lower leg was cut off. As we eventually saw, this was enough to prevent him from being turned. So the idea that a bite somehow contains a contaminant that is transmitted via the bloodstream seems improbable (since the speed at which blood is propelled around the body is far quicker than any impromptu amputation can head off). I discussed the issue with a friend who has a better grasp of medical matters than I do and he suggested the most likely explanation would be to consider a bite from a walker to create an infection akin to gangrene; a disease of the flesh. If gangrene is left untreated it eventually spreads and kills the host, and this principal would hold true to being bitten by a walker.
At first I didn't like this idea, but as it has stayed with me I actually think I prefer it (and I think it makes more sense). For a zombie bite to infect a person's blood there would have to be some kind of fluid exchange - like saliva. Can we be entirely convinced that every rotten, dried-out carcass zombie that ever bit anyone contained saliva? That a bite from something dead against something alive would create an infected, gangrenous effect in the flesh is actually more agreeable. And so cutting off Hershal's lower limb and thus saving him has, after a week of rumination, become something I find preferable!
I am also glad that Hershal survived, mind. And I particularly liked how he reached his hand up upon waking and Rick was there to clasp it. I believe that whilst Rick makes all the hard decisions and bears the brunt of moral dilemma he will need Hershal more and more to anchor his conscience. Rick ought to, of course, be reliant on Lori for that kind of support but, as I shall speak more of further on, their relationship simply does not exist in that manner at the present time.
Carol had a subplot this episode that served two purposes. The first was to generally create the possibility that Hershal wouldn't survive. Her going out and learning how to perform a cesarean section on walkers was potentially generating a strand of drama that could see an amateur Carol attempt to see Lori and her unborn child safely through childbirth. That turned out to be something of a red herring, though did at least inform us that Carol has been groomed as the group's nurse and doctor no matter what - importantly giving her a role to play.
The moment where it appeared she was being observed was perhaps the most crucial occurrence overall, though. It's tricky to figure out what to make of it as we were given absolutely no idea as to the identity of the observer. I did wonder if they wouldn't have seen Carol performing her bizarre operations on the walkers and think that the people in the prison were serious twisted! If they were benevolent, potentially friendly allies to Rick's group then they certainly wouldn't have been given a good impression. However, the nature of them skulking in the trees and watching from afar and staying that way suggests they are up to no good. I expect them, whoever they are, to represent yet another problem when they reveal themselves!
There's only one small thing marring my enjoyment of this new season, and that's the grey area surrounding the rift between Rick and Lori. I am still unsure if it's due to an event we are not yet completely aware of or whether it's been a gradual drifting apart as a consequence of what happened between those two and Shane. I really want it to be due to something we have not yet seen; some event that occurred during the winter between seasons (ha!) two and three. My trouble is I don't know if I am reading too much into it or whether I am missing something very obvious.
I don't know if the show has created this mystery, or I've created a mystery for myself by not paying the right attention.
It would be a minor bugbear but the episode ended on this very matter and is clearly crucial to the drama. Never-the-less, the reason for the rift felt negligible during the emotional brutality of the final scene. Lori's quiet need felt like a whimper against the hurricane of Rick's adamant refusal to deal with the issue between them. He could tell her she had done a good job with the group but that was the extent of it, and how doubly cruel it was for him to reach out a hand only to give her a basic complimentary touch and then move on. She was left stroking the shoulder where his hand had been, alone, silently devastated.
Lori has never been a particular favourite of mine, quite the opposite really. But even my heart wanted to reach out for her. As I've said, the matter of what went on between them feels pertinent (is there someone particularly in the wrong out of the two of them?) and also irrelevant - it's just a minor annoyance that I might be reading the show wrong about what I am supposed to be expecting. Until I know better, however, I'll stick with the idea that Rick and Lori's fallout is due to something that happened which we are not aware of, and I hope I am right.
What was the best part?
The Walking Dead knows how to eke out tense beats better than any other show I can think of right now. This episode contained one such beat. When the long-haired prisoner, who was clearly displaying psychotic tendencies, wide-eyed and covered in the blood of his former prisonmate, opened two doors instead of one and let a torrent of walkers in the scene was loaded with one inevitability: something was going to go wrong. As it transpired the walkers were dispatched, but one close shave for Rick was all the justification he needed. One protracted Walking Dead dramatic beat of tension ensued as Rick and the man faced off, and then wham! Rick slams a machete down into the man's brainbox and splits it in two. Well, you gotta destroy the brain otherwise they just come back. . .
What do I think will happen next?
I saw the preview for the next episode looked like it was filled with all manner of excitement. Andrea and her enigmatic partner seem to feature prominently, but more eye-catching was the apparent return of Merle. If he is back then it cannot be too long before the long-awaited brotherly reunion between Merle and Daryl occurs. I'd like to believe that Daryl has now become 100% loyal to Rick and the group, so Merle couldn't just show up and rock the boat in that way. However, how Daryl would react to his brother is a fascinating prospect.
Prediction, long shot as it is, is that the person who observed Carol is also a part of the group that Andrea and her partner encountered. This would get all the key cast members within the same area, within the same plot, which would probably suit The Walking Dead better. The fact that Andrea was completely omitted from this episode shows that it is not a show that is well-suited to cutting away to different characters in different areas. It exists better when it keeps things localised, focused, so I do hope we see all major protagonists and antagonists all together before too long.
I saw the preview for the next episode looked like it was filled with all manner of excitement. Andrea and her enigmatic partner seem to feature prominently, but more eye-catching was the apparent return of Merle. If he is back then it cannot be too long before the long-awaited brotherly reunion between Merle and Daryl occurs. I'd like to believe that Daryl has now become 100% loyal to Rick and the group, so Merle couldn't just show up and rock the boat in that way. However, how Daryl would react to his brother is a fascinating prospect.
Prediction, long shot as it is, is that the person who observed Carol is also a part of the group that Andrea and her partner encountered. This would get all the key cast members within the same area, within the same plot, which would probably suit The Walking Dead better. The fact that Andrea was completely omitted from this episode shows that it is not a show that is well-suited to cutting away to different characters in different areas. It exists better when it keeps things localised, focused, so I do hope we see all major protagonists and antagonists all together before too long.